paragraph 18 or 19 of Schedule 3 to the2002 Act(directed and independent investigations) applied, or, paragraph 16 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act (investigations by the appropriate authority on its own behalf) applied andthe Director General. . Regulation 13 provides that this Part does not apply to a case to which paragraph 16, 18 or 19 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act applies (investigations by an appropriate authority on its own behalf and investigations directed or undertaken by the Director General). The officer that stops you will know you've been issued the written warning recently during a prior traffic . (b)makes a direction under section 28A(1) or (4) of the 2002 Act (application of Part 2 to old cases)(35) in relation to a matter on or after 1st February 2020. these Regulations apply regardless of when the complaint or matter came to the attention of the appropriate authority. Also, as happened to me in Guthrie, it enables a "no contest" plea, which involves the regular fine, a stern warning from the judge, and no other punishment - if one doesn't get another in 6 months. (7)Where, on the date of the severity assessment under regulation 14(1) of these Regulations or under regulation 16 of the Complaints and Misconduct Regulations, the officer concerned had been reduced in rank under the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2004 or under these Regulations, a reduction in rank may not be imposed. where the police force concerned is the metropolitan police force, an assistant commissioner, or. conducting or and or misconduct meeting were omitted; in sub-paragraph (a), person or were omitted; for sub-paragraphs (c) and (d), there were substituted. the complainant and any interested person, in any case to which regulation 60 applies. if the officer concerned is subject to such a finding, the officer will be included in the police barred list; subject to the harm test, set out any findings relating to the conduct to which the investigation relates in any investigation report submitted to the Director General under Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act; set out the persons rights under paragraph (3); in the case of the officer concerned, state that the officer has the right to seek advice from the officers staff association or any other body and the effect of regulation 7(1) and (2). (3)Where cases are referred to joint misconduct proceedings, a reference to the officer concerned in regulations 26 to 44, if the context so requires, means. (ISP 553), the Receipt for -0 Ticket Book s, form ISP 5-042, will be completed and signed by the receiving officer or Truck Weight Inspector (T.W.I.) a designated police volunteer serving in that force. The police officer gives these warnings as a wake-up call for the traffic law violator so that he or she can reflect back and determine why they were pulled over in the first place. (b)the duty specified in paragraph (4) to supply a list of proposed witnesses or give notice that there are no proposed witnesses lies with the Director General, and not with the appropriate authority or the originating authority. (5)Where a report is submitted to the appropriate authority under paragraph (4), the appropriate authority must make a further severity assessment under regulation 14. reduction in rank, where paragraph (5) or (6) applies; dismissal without notice, where paragraph (5) or (6) applies; where the person conducting or chairing the misconduct proceedings decides the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to gross misconduct, in accordance with regulation 41(15), a period of 18 months beginning with the day on which it was notified to the officer concerned, in the case of a written warning, or. They operate alongside the Police (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2020 (S.I. Stay up to date with the latest community news written by award-winning editors and local reporters. Today was my first time getting pulled over. subject to the harm test, give the officer a copy of the investigators report or such parts of that report as relate to the officer. the Director General may attend the misconduct proceedings to make representations. Certain crimes require an officer to take action domestic violence, for instance. Condition C special determination: procedure, Before making a Condition C special determination the Director General must give a notification in writing to. (9)The appropriate authority or, as the case may be, the originating authority may apply to the person conducting or chairing the misconduct proceedings for an extension of. Regulation 12 is to be read as if for and decision on disciplinary action, there were substituted , any decision on disciplinary action for gross misconduct. the period of 100 working days specified in paragraph (2); the period of 30 working days specified in paragraph (5). 54.(1)Before the end of 7 working days beginning with the first working day after the written notice is given to the officer concerned under regulation 51(1), the officer concerned must give the appropriate authority. (This note is not part of the Regulations). (5)No witness may give evidence at misconduct proceedings unless the person conducting or chairing the proceedings reasonably believes that it is necessary for the witness to do so in the interests of justice, in which case the person conducting or chairing the proceedings must, (a)where the witness is a police officer, cause that person to be ordered to attend the misconduct proceedings, and. (c)provide the Director General with a copy of the written notice given under paragraph (1). 12. (c)a person selected in accordance with regulation 28(4)(c). (4)Subject to the harm test, a copy of the information provided under paragraph (1) or (2) must be sent to the officer concerned. only asked coz he wrote $167 beside it. When making a Condition C special determination the Director General must take into account in addition to the matters specified in regulation 4A. (5)Where more than one allegation is considered in the same misconduct proceedings in accordance with regulation 4(9), this regulation applies to the whole of the proceedings and accordingly the Director General may make representations in respect of any allegation. the conduct that is the subject matter of the case and how that conduct is alleged to amount to misconduct or gross misconduct, as the case may be, as set out in the notice given in accordance with regulation 30(1)(a). (3)The requirement to provide information under paragraph (1) does not apply in a case where it appears to the appropriate authority that to do so might prejudice the investigation or any other investigation (including a criminal investigation). This means they won't affect your car insurance rate. ), or. 18.(1)Before the end of 10 working days beginning with the first working day after the terms of reference, or, as the case may be, written notice has been given under regulation 17(2), (a)the officer concerned may provide a written or oral statement relating to any matter under investigation to the investigator, including any mitigating circumstances relevant to any such matter, and. A written warning by contrast looks like a traffic ticket. 39.(1)Subject to paragraph (3), a misconduct hearing must be in public. Citations go into the legal system and can be pursued or defended in state court. (2)Any such lists or notice must be supplied before the end of 10 working days beginning with the first working day after the parties supplied the lists or notice under regulation 31(4). However, you should carefully read over the paper he gave you to make sure that it was actually a warning ticket and that there is no court date or fine on the paper. (6)Reduction in rank may only be imposed under this regulation where the person or persons imposing the disciplinary action consider this is an appropriate sanction, taking into account the views of the appropriate authority, including in relation to the likely operational impact. (6)Where the appropriate authority is required to publish the report in accordance with paragraph (5), it must do so as soon as practicable after the officer concerned is notified of the outcome of the accelerated misconduct hearing under paragraph (3). (2)Where the chair requires notice to be given in accordance with paragraph (1), the appropriate authority or, as the case may be, the originating authority, must publish the notice on its website as soon as practicable after notice of the hearing is given under regulation 35(1). the appropriate authority is the chief officer of any police force, and. In many cases, officers also have the discretion to issue warning citations. (6)Paragraph (1) does not apply in a case where the Director General has made a decision under regulation 24(1) to present a case. i did get a written warning (cop was really nice and dropped it from a ticket cuz he was . (b)the disciplinary proceedings would not be the first disciplinary proceedings to be taken against P in respect of the alleged gross misconduct unless they result from a re-investigation of the allegation (whether carried out under these Regulations or under the2002 Act) that begins not later than 12 months after the date on which P ceased to be a police officer. A written warning from a police officer to a driver is in lieu of a traffic ticket. (c)there was a serious breach of the procedures set out in these Regulations or other unfairness which could have materially affected the finding or decision on disciplinary action. a person appointed by the local policing body, selected on a fair and transparent basis from a list of candidates maintained by the local policing body for the purpose of these Regulations. If you get pulled over for a traffic violation, police officers have the option of giving you a written warning in lieu of a ticket. (8)Where the appropriate authority or the originating authority publishes a report in accordance with paragraph (6), it must publish the report on its website for a period of not less than 28 days. that whilst the officer does not have to say anything it may harm the officers case if the officer does not mention when interviewed or when providing any information under regulation 18(1) or 31(2) or (3) something later relied on in any disciplinary proceedings. (11)In a case to which paragraph 18 or 19 of Schedule 3 to the2002 Act(directed and independent investigations) applied, the appropriate authority must consult withthe Director General, (a)in deciding whether or not to suspend the officer concerned under this regulation, and. Cordner et al. if (after the officer denied misconduct) the person conducting or chairing the misconduct meeting found that the officers conduct amounted to misconduct, against that finding or any disciplinary action imposed under regulation 42. the finding or disciplinary action imposed was unreasonable; there is evidence that could not reasonably have been considered at the misconduct meeting which could have materially affected the finding or decision on disciplinary action, or. the seriousness of the alleged gross misconduct; the impact of the allegation on public confidence in the police, and, When assessing the seriousness of the alleged gross misconduct for the purposes of paragraph (2)(a), the matters which the Director General must take into account are. (i)after 18(1) there were inserted , 20A(2); (ii)for of the Complaints and Misconduct Regulations there were substituted or 21A(2) of the Complaints and Misconduct Regulations, as modified by regulation 42 of, and Schedule 2 to, those Regulations; (g)in paragraphs (14) and (16), person or were omitted; (h)for paragraph (15) there were substituted. has a duty under paragraph 27(4)(b) of that Schedule (duties with respect to disciplinary proceedings etc.) The investigator must make a written record of any notice of enquiry and response received under this regulation. gave a direction to the appropriate authority under paragraph 27(4)(a) of that Schedule (duties with respect to disciplinary proceedings), there is sufficient evidence, in the form of written statements or other documents, to establish on the balance of probabilities that the conduct of the officer concerned constitutes gross misconduct, and. the officer proposes an alternative date or time which satisfies paragraph (3). (4)When assessing the impact of the allegation on public confidence in the police for the purposes of paragraph (2)(b), the matters which the Director General must take into account are. (b)if the officer concerned is present at the accelerated misconduct hearing or is participating in it by video link or other means in accordance with regulation 57(2), confer with the officer. (b)includes such a document containing suggestions as to lines of inquiry to be pursued or witnesses to be interviewed.